In this regard, “humanitarian borders” are a recent concept in the international system, which oversees some efforts to alleviate the pain and suffering of migrants at borders, especially the borders of the European Union, which has not been able to practically secure the rights of refugees, and has lost its reality in light of the security interests of the European Union.
Therefore, the main question of this research is: To what extent has the idea of establishing humanitarian borders, by the European Union, been able to secure the basic and self-evident rights of migrants and refugees?
The research assumption is as follows: The EU's humanitarian border policies and measures, which should logically alleviate the suffering of migrants and refugees, are influenced by political considerations more than by human rights requirements, and have practically become part of the justifications for all types of violations and violence at the EU's borders. This research - using a normative-descriptive approach, a qualitative approach and focusing on the literature on humanitarian borders - argues that emphasizing the measures and components of "humanitarian security", rather than "national security" and "state security", could be a suitable framework for demarcating humanitarian borders. So that the basis of this security is human life and dignity, protecting the basic pillars of human life in the face of widespread threats, and providing the necessary resources for the lives of refugees and migrants.
Comments