which represented a decisive intellectual turning point in the history of Western thought as a whole, as he contributed through his genealogical reading of history, to the transition from the stage of modernity to the stage of post-modernity, then to transcend the Western philosophical conception, aiming at build the history of humanity, and not to destroy it by creating new concepts, which serve human civilization in the stage of post-modernity.
Nietzsche sought to make his philosophy speak about his era, and its weakness and frailty. This explains his why he is averse to it, rejects it, and considers it as a kind of intellectual decadence, and weakness that must be changed and overcome, by finding new concepts that serve humanity. However, this philosophy has led him into a series of intellectual and ideological pitfalls, which have made it the subject of wide-ranging intellectual debate. So, how did Nietzsche understand history, and on what foundations did he build his genealogy in the philosophy of history, and what are the most important philosophical pitfalls that his philosophy fell into?
Comments